Re: [PATCH v2] mm: clarify GFP_ATOMIC/GFP_NOWAIT doc-comment

[Mike Rapoport]

On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 11:32:18AM +0000, Brendan Jackman wrote:
> The current description of contexts where it's invalid to make
> GFP_ATOMIC and GFP_NOWAIT calls is rather vague.
> 
> Replace this with a direct description of the actual contexts of concern
> and refer to the RT docs where this is explained more discursively.
> 
> While rejigging this prose, also move the documentation of GFP_NOWAIT to
> the GFP_NOWAIT section.
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/d912480a-5229-4efe-9336-b31acded30f5@xxxxxxx/
> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@xxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Specified section in docs reference
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/DF0J58HOVLL4.2E16Q87D2UXRW@xxxxxxxxxx/
> ---
>  include/linux/gfp_types.h | 7 +++++--
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.