[PATCH 03/13] spi: cadence-qspi: Fix style and improve readability

[Miquel Raynal (Schneider Electric)]

It took me several seconds to correctly understand this block. I
understand the goal: showing that we are in the if, or in one of the two
other cases. Improve the organization of the code to both improve
readability and fix the style.

Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal (Schneider Electric) <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c
index e16a591e1f20..90387757fb6b 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c
@@ -376,13 +376,13 @@ static irqreturn_t cqspi_irq_handler(int this_irq, void *dev)
 			complete(&cqspi->transfer_complete);
 			return IRQ_HANDLED;
 		}
+	} else {
+		if (!cqspi->slow_sram)
+			irq_status &= CQSPI_IRQ_MASK_RD | CQSPI_IRQ_MASK_WR;
+		else
+			irq_status &= CQSPI_REG_IRQ_WATERMARK | CQSPI_IRQ_MASK_WR;
 	}
 
-	else if (!cqspi->slow_sram)
-		irq_status &= CQSPI_IRQ_MASK_RD | CQSPI_IRQ_MASK_WR;
-	else
-		irq_status &= CQSPI_REG_IRQ_WATERMARK | CQSPI_IRQ_MASK_WR;
-
 	if (irq_status)
 		complete(&cqspi->transfer_complete);
 

-- 
2.51.1