Re: [PATCH] ksmbd: Fix to handle removal of rfc1002 header from smb_hdr

From: ChenXiaoSong

Date: Thu Dec 18 2025 - 10:47:16 EST


Hi David,

Since the size of `struct smb_hdr` has changed, the value of `SMB1_MIN_SUPPORTED_HEADER_SIZE` should also be updated to `(sizeof(struct smb_hdr) + 4)`. `SMB1_MIN_SUPPORTED_HEADER_SIZE` is used in `ksmbd_conn_handler_loop()`.

Thanks,
ChenXiaoSong.

On 12/18/25 11:09 PM, ChenXiaoSong wrote:
`ksmbd_conn_handler_loop()` calls `get_rfc1002_len()`. Does this need to be updated as well?

Thanks,
ChenXiaoSong.

On 12/18/25 10:48 PM, David Howells wrote:
Hi Namjae,

Does this (untested) patch fix the problem for you?

David
---
The commit that removed the RFC1002 header from struct smb_hdr didn't also
fix the places in ksmbd that use it in order to provide graceful rejection
of SMB1 protocol requests.

Fixes: 83bfbd0bb902 ("cifs: Remove the RFC1002 header from smb_hdr")
Reported-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ CAKYAXd9Ju4MFkkH5Jxfi1mO0AWEr=R35M3vQ_Xa7Yw34JoNZ0A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
cc: Steve French <sfrench@xxxxxxxxx>
cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc: Tom Talpey <tom@xxxxxxxxxx>
cc: Paulo Alcantara <pc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc: Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc: linux-cifs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
cc: netfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
  fs/smb/server/server.c     |    2 +-
  fs/smb/server/smb_common.c |   10 +++++-----
  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/smb/server/server.c b/fs/smb/server/server.c
index 3cea16050e4f..bedc8390b6db 100644
--- a/fs/smb/server/server.c
+++ b/fs/smb/server/server.c
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ static inline int check_conn_state(struct ksmbd_work *work)
      if (ksmbd_conn_exiting(work->conn) ||
          ksmbd_conn_need_reconnect(work->conn)) {
-        rsp_hdr = work->response_buf;
+        rsp_hdr = smb2_get_msg(work->response_buf);
          rsp_hdr->Status.CifsError = STATUS_CONNECTION_DISCONNECTED;
          return 1;
      }
diff --git a/fs/smb/server/smb_common.c b/fs/smb/server/smb_common.c
index b23203a1c286..d6084580b59d 100644
--- a/fs/smb/server/smb_common.c
+++ b/fs/smb/server/smb_common.c
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ int ksmbd_verify_smb_message(struct ksmbd_work *work)
      if (smb2_hdr->ProtocolId == SMB2_PROTO_NUMBER)
          return ksmbd_smb2_check_message(work);
-    hdr = work->request_buf;
+    hdr = smb2_get_msg(work->request_buf);
      if (*(__le32 *)hdr->Protocol == SMB1_PROTO_NUMBER &&
          hdr->Command == SMB_COM_NEGOTIATE) {
          work->conn->outstanding_credits++;
@@ -278,7 +278,6 @@ static int ksmbd_negotiate_smb_dialect(void *buf)
                            req->DialectCount);
      }
-    proto = *(__le32 *)((struct smb_hdr *)buf)->Protocol;
      if (proto == SMB1_PROTO_NUMBER) {
          struct smb_negotiate_req *req;
@@ -320,8 +319,8 @@ static u16 get_smb1_cmd_val(struct ksmbd_work *work)
   */
  static int init_smb1_rsp_hdr(struct ksmbd_work *work)
  {
-    struct smb_hdr *rsp_hdr = (struct smb_hdr *)work->response_buf;
-    struct smb_hdr *rcv_hdr = (struct smb_hdr *)work->request_buf;
+    struct smb_hdr *rsp_hdr = (struct smb_hdr *)smb2_get_msg(work- >response_buf);
+    struct smb_hdr *rcv_hdr = (struct smb_hdr *)smb2_get_msg(work- >request_buf);
      rsp_hdr->Command = SMB_COM_NEGOTIATE;
      *(__le32 *)rsp_hdr->Protocol = SMB1_PROTO_NUMBER;
@@ -412,9 +411,10 @@ static int init_smb1_server(struct ksmbd_conn *conn)
  int ksmbd_init_smb_server(struct ksmbd_conn *conn)
  {
+    struct smb_hdr *rcv_hdr = (struct smb_hdr *)smb2_get_msg(conn- >request_buf);
      __le32 proto;
-    proto = *(__le32 *)((struct smb_hdr *)conn->request_buf)->Protocol;
+    proto = *(__le32 *)rcv_hdr->Protocol;
      if (conn->need_neg == false) {
          if (proto == SMB1_PROTO_NUMBER)
              return -EINVAL;