Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] media: dt-bindings: Add qcom,sm6150-camss

From: Dmitry Baryshkov

Date: Wed Dec 24 2025 - 00:03:39 EST


On Wed, Dec 24, 2025 at 12:31:33PM +0800, Wenmeng Liu wrote:
>
>
> On 12/24/2025 12:21 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 24, 2025 at 11:18:02AM +0800, Wenmeng Liu wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 12/23/2025 9:38 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Dec 22, 2025 at 04:28:39PM +0800, Wenmeng Liu wrote:
> > > > > + interconnects:
> > > > > + maxItems: 4
> > > > > +
> > > > > + interconnect-names:
> > > > > + items:
> > > > > + - const: ahb
> > > > > + - const: hf0_mnoc
> > > > > + - const: hf1_mnoc
> > > >
> > > > Same comments as before, do not invent names.
> > >
> > > <&mmss_noc MASTER_CAMNOC_HF0 QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS
> > > &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1 QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS>,
> > > <&mmss_noc MASTER_CAMNOC_HF1 QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS
> > > &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1 QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS>,
> > >
> > > This platform(qcs615) is different from others. It has two types of sf,
> > > namely sf0 and sf1.
> > > The same as it is:
> > > sc7180 sc8180x sdm670 sdm845 sm8150
> > > Do you have any suggestions about this?
> >
> > Which _names_ are used on other platforms? This question is quite clear
> > from Krzysztof's comment.
>
> The platform mentioned above either has no camss ICC node or no support for
> CAMSS on the upstream, so this is a new one.

I did a quick look for you.

kodiak, lemans, monaco: ahb, hf_0

x1e80100: ahb, hf_mnoc, sf_mnoc, sf_icp_mnoc
sm8650: ahb, hf_mnoc
agatti: ahb, hf_mnoc, sf_mnoc
sm8550: ahb, hf_0_mnoc

sc8280xp: cam_ahb, cam_hf_mnoc, cam_sf_mnoc, cam_sf_icp_mnoc
sm8250: cam_ahb, cam_hf_0_mnoc, cam_sf_0_mnoc, cam_sf_icp_mnoc
sdm660: vfe-mem

I'd obviously hope for some unification here. Other than that, we have
two clean winners: KLM and X Elite+SM8650+Agatti. Yours proposal is
different from either of the options. In fact, none of the platforms
have the same _approach_ as yours. Why?

--
With best wishes
Dmitry