Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] media: dt-bindings: Add qcom,sm6150-camss

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 24/12/2025 04:18, Wenmeng Liu wrote:
> 
> 
> On 12/23/2025 9:38 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 22, 2025 at 04:28:39PM +0800, Wenmeng Liu wrote:
>>> +  interconnects:
>>> +    maxItems: 4
>>> +
>>> +  interconnect-names:
>>> +    items:
>>> +      - const: ahb
>>> +      - const: hf0_mnoc
>>> +      - const: hf1_mnoc
>>
>> Same comments as before, do not invent names.
> 
> <&mmss_noc MASTER_CAMNOC_HF0 QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS
> &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1 QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS>,
> <&mmss_noc MASTER_CAMNOC_HF1 QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS
> &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1 QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS>,

How is it relevant to the names?

> 
> This platform(qcs615) is different from others. It has two types of sf, 
> namely sf0 and sf1.

How is it relevant to the names?

> The same as it is:
> sc7180 sc8180x sdm670 sdm845 sm8150
> Do you have any suggestions about this?

Open any other binding. What are the names there?




> 
>>
>> I finish review here and ignore the rest. You did not respond to
>> previous comments and I do not see any improvements.
> 
> I'm sorry about this. However, the previous comments did not clearly 
> point out the problem.
> 
>> Also, way you send patches makes it difficult for us, so I see no reason
>> why it should be my task to try to decipher all this.
>>
>> b4 diff '20251222-sm6150-camss-v2-1-df8469a8343a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
>> Checking for older revisions
>> Grabbing search results from lore.kernel.org
>> ---
>> Analyzing 5 messages in the thread
>> Could not find lower series to compare against.
> 
> --in-reply-to, will pay attention in the next version.

What? No. You are supposed to use properly b4, which solves all these
problems.

Best regards,
Krzysztof