Re: [PATCH v4 7/7] kernel.h: drop trace_printk.h
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Sun Dec 28 2025 - 16:32:03 EST
On Fri, 26 Dec 2025 11:58:48 -0500 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Dec 2025 12:09:29 -0500
> "Yury Norov (NVIDIA)" <yury.norov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > The trace_printk.h header is debugging-only by nature, but now it's
> > included by almost every compilation unit via kernel.h.
> >
> > Removing trace_printk.h saves 1.5-2% of compilation time on my
> > Ubuntu-derived x86_64/localyesconfig.
> >
> > There's ~30 files in the codebase, requiring trace_printk.h for
> > non-debugging reasons: mostly to disable tracing on panic or under
> > similar conditions. Include the header for those explicitly.
> >
> > This implicitly decouples linux/kernel.h and linux/instruction_pointer.h
> > as well, because it has been isolated to trace_printk.h early in the
> > series.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yury Norov (NVIDIA) <yury.norov@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> I'm still against this patch. It means every time someone adds
> trace_printk() they need to add the header for it.
>
> trace_printk() should be as available to the kernel as printk() is.
um, why? trace_printk is used 1% as often as is printk. Seems
reasonable to include a header file to access such a rarely-used(!) and
specialized thing?