Re: [PATCH v1 3/8] dt-bindings: thermal: Add qcom,qmi-cooling yaml bindings
From: Dmitry Baryshkov
Date: Wed Dec 31 2025 - 02:55:33 EST
On 31/12/2025 09:52, Gaurav Kohli wrote:
On 12/31/2025 1:17 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 31, 2025 at 12:12:04PM +0530, Gaurav Kohli wrote:
On 12/24/2025 3:54 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:You can't have a node called cdsp_sw. Underscores are not allowed in
On 24/12/2025 11:08, Gaurav Kohli wrote:
On 12/24/2025 2:27 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:How? This is v1, not v2. How did you address other comments? Where did
On 23/12/2025 13:32, Gaurav Kohli wrote:This patch is based on older series
The cooling subnode of a remoteproc represents a client of the Thermaldefs, look at other code
Mitigation Device QMI service running on it. Each subnode of the cooling
node represents a single control exposed by the service.
Add maintainer name also and update this binding for cdsp substem.
Co-developed-by: Casey Connolly <casey.connolly@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Gaurav Kohli <gaurav.kohli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Casey Connolly <casey.connolly@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../bindings/remoteproc/qcom,pas-common.yaml | 6 ++
.../bindings/thermal/qcom,qmi-cooling.yaml | 99 ++++++++++ +++++++++
2 files changed, 105 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/ qcom,qmi-cooling.yaml
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ qcom,pas-common.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ remoteproc/qcom,pas-common.yaml
index 63a82e7a8bf8..bbc82253f76b 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,pas- common.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,pas- common.yaml
@@ -77,6 +77,12 @@ properties:
and devices related to the ADSP.
unevaluatedProperties: false
+ cooling:
+ $ref: /schemas/thermal/qcom,qmi-cooling.yaml#
+ description:
+ Cooling subnode which represents the cooling devices exposed by the Modem.
+ unevaluatedProperties: false
+
required:
- clocks
- clock-names
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom,qmi- cooling.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/ qcom,qmi-cooling.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..90b46712d241
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom,qmi- cooling.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
+# Copyright 2023 (c), Linaro Limited
+
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/thermal/qcom,qmi-cooling.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Qualcomm QMI based thermal mitigation (TMD) cooling devices.
+
+maintainers:
+ - Caleb Connolly <caleb.connolly@xxxxxxxxxx>
+ - Gaurav Kohli <gaurav.kohli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+
+description:
+ Qualcomm QMI-based TMD cooling devices are used to mitigate thermal conditions
+ across multiple remote subsystems. These devices operate based on junction temperature
+ sensors (TSENS) associated with thermal zones for each subsystem.
+
+ Each subnode corresponds to a control interface for a single instance of the TMD
+ service running on a remote subsystem.
+
+definitions:
+ tmd:Missing proper formatting. Please do not send us code written by LLM.
+ type: object
+ description: |
+ A single Thermal Mitigation Device exposed by a remote subsystem.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20230905-caleb- qmi_cooling-v1-0-5aa39d4164a7@xxxxxxxxxx/, did some manual changes to remove unusable code.
you provide proper changelog? Why this is not correctly versioned/
let me fix the formatting. This is not generated code.I do not believe, because this:
+ phandle: true
As i have mentioned in earlier reply, we are including below series:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20230905-caleb-qmi_cooling- v1-0-5aa39d4164a7@xxxxxxxxxx/,)
as this is client for remote proc cooling.
I was seeing this error while using older yam files.
('cdsp_sw' was unexpected)
from schema qcom,qmi-cooling.yaml
So to avoid that, i have added phandle to avoid this error. will fix this in
proper way
by including another yaml file which will define the cdsp_sw,
Below is the dt node:
cooling {
+ compatible = "qcom,qmi-cooling-cdsp";
+ cdsp_sw: cdsp_sw {
node names.
Will change to cdsp-sw.
Why do you need a subnode at all? Can there be multiple cooling "devices" for a DSP? Also, if you insist on having a subnode, could you please come up with a _generic_ enough name that would describe the node? cdsp-sw definitely isn't generic.
thanks
Gaurav
+ label = "cdsp_sw";
+ #cooling-cells = <2>;
+ };
+ };
Does not exist. You cannot come with something like that, there is no
such code.
Only LLM when parsing DTB could invent something like this. Otherwise
explain me please the process leading to coming to such change.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
With best wishes
Dmitry