Re: [PATCH v2 00/28] Eliminate Dying Memory Cgroup

[Roman Gushchin]

Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Tue, Dec 30, 2025 at 02:18:51PM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
>> >>>> I just think you should do a preliminary review of the AI ​​review results
>> >>>> instead of sending them out directly. Otherwise, if everyone does this,
>> >>>> the community will be full of bots.
>> 
>> I do think it's awkward to dump the whole review output for the patch
>> series in a single message.  It looks like there's a sudden jump to
>> XML?
>> It's better to reply to the individual patches with the comments
>> inline, which I think is where Roman is trying to go long term.
>
> I don't know what Roman's trying to do long-term, but his email
> that started this thread was so badly written that it was offensive.
> Had it been sent to me, I would have responded in the style of Arkell
> v Pressdram.

It felt awkward to send a bunch of emails from myself, all beginning
with the "I ran the ai review and here is the output" header.
Once we have a bot, obviously it's better to answer individual emails,
as the bpf subsystem does.