Re: [1/3] scsi: lpfc: Fix memory leak in lpfc_config_port_post()

[Zilin Guan]

> I suggest to take another look at information from previous discussions on
> severity filters.
> ...
> It seems that basic data processing was not hindered so far by the affected
> function implementation.
> ...
> The tag “Fixes” is also an indication for related development considerations,
> isn't it?

Thanks for the clarification.

I agree that the "Fixes" tag provides sufficient context for tracking. 
Given that the bug does not impact basic functionality, I will rely 
on the "Fixes" tag and leave the backporting decision to the stable 
maintainers' discretion, rather than explicitly adding the "Cc: stable".

I will send out v2 with the code refactoring (using goto) shortly.

Regards,
Zilin Guan