Re: [v5 PATCH 1/2] hung_task: Introduce helper for hung task warning

[Lance Yang]

On 2026/1/2 03:28, Aaron Tomlin wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 01, 2026 at 05:49:59PM +0800, Lance Yang wrote:
> > I am wondering whether we should leave that code as-is to
> > avoid unnecessary churn ...
> >
> > That code was not particularly complex or duplicated :)
>
> Hi Lance,
>
> While I agree the current logic is simple, separating the verbose reporting
> from the detection loop significantly improves the readability of
> check_hung_task(). This refactoring introduces no runtime overhead
> (static inline) while providing a cleaner, encapsulated structure for any
> future diagnostic enhancements.

For a single-use diagnostic block, I still think this refactoring
does not add much practical value ...

Let's leave the code alone - it's probably not worth the churn :)