Re: [v2] gfs2: Fix use-after-free in gfs2_fill_super()

[Ryota Sakamoto]

On Tue, Dec 30, 2025 at 4:46 PM Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Is there a need to indicate a role for the mentioned identifier?

Yes, "fail_threads" is a goto label. And including "label" in the message
explicitly is precise.

> Do you propose to use another label here?

Yes, I am proposing a new label "fail_threads".
I chose this name to maintain consistency with the existing error labels
in this function (e.g., fail_per_node, fail_inodes).

If a v3 is required for other reasons, I will update the commit message
to include "label".

Regards,