Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] reset: spacemit: fix auxiliary device id
From: Alex Elder
Date: Fri Jan 02 2026 - 10:42:43 EST
On 12/30/25 8:09 PM, Yixun Lan wrote:
Hi Alex,
On 18:50 Mon 29 Dec , Alex Elder wrote:
On 12/26/25 12:55 AM, Yixun Lan wrote:
Due to the auxiliary register procedure moved to ccu common module,
the auxiliary device id need to be adjusted, otherwise reset driver
will fail to probe.
Signed-off-by: Yixun Lan <dlan@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/reset/reset-spacemit.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/reset/reset-spacemit.c b/drivers/reset/reset-spacemit.c
index e1272aff28f7..8922e14fa836 100644
--- a/drivers/reset/reset-spacemit.c
+++ b/drivers/reset/reset-spacemit.c
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ static int spacemit_reset_probe(struct auxiliary_device *adev,
#define K1_AUX_DEV_ID(_unit) \
{ \
- .name = "spacemit_ccu_k1." #_unit "-reset", \
+ .name = "spacemit_ccu." _K_RST(_unit), \
.driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&k1_ ## _unit ## _reset_data, \
}
The above macro is named K1_AUX_DEV_ID(). Why don't you
define K3_AUX_DEV_ID(), which could use "k3" in its name?
that should also works, the idea of using same macro '_K_RST()' here
is trying to explictly tell users the clock and reset shares same name
You mean like "spacemit,k1-syscon-mpmu" is used, and you'd rather
name the reset "spacemit.k1-mpmu-reset" because it sort of matches
a little better than "spacemit_ccu_k1.mpmu-reset"?
Anyway, when K1_AUX_DEV_ID() was defined, it was named that way
to suggest a pattern that would mean K3_AUX_DEV_ID() would also
be defined.
I don't really care where the "k1"/"k3" goes, before or after the
period. But I think the "k1" could be encoded explicitly here
rather than doing it with _K_RST() (i.e., don't even use a macro).
-Alex
Anyway, if you go this route I suggest you drop "K1_" from the
name of this macro.
or could further refactor the code, to make K1/K3 drivers share same macro
anyway I don't want to change this patch, my goal here is tring to fix
reset driver after clock common driver refactored plus the modularization
introduced, it's more proper to leave those refactor work up to Guodong,
since he did a lot adjustment to add reset support for K3 SoC