Re: [PATCH v2 01/19] blk-integrity: take const pointer in blk_integrity_rq()

From: Martin K. Petersen
Date: Sun Jan 04 2026 - 16:50:24 EST

Next message: Marek Vasut: "Re: [PATCH] PCI: controller: Mark controllers which cannot do lockless config access with !PCI_LOCKLESS_CONFIG"
Previous message: Stephen Rothwell: "linux-next: duplicate patches in the bluetooth tree"
In reply to: Caleb Sander Mateos: "[PATCH v2 01/19] blk-integrity: take const pointer in blk_integrity_rq()"
Next in thread: Caleb Sander Mateos: "[PATCH v2 11/19] ublk: optimize ublk_user_copy() on daemon task"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Caleb,

> blk_integrity_rq() doesn't modify the struct request passed in, so allow
> a const pointer to be passed. Use a matching signature for the
> !CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INTEGRITY version.

Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>

--
Martin K. Petersen

Next message: Marek Vasut: "Re: [PATCH] PCI: controller: Mark controllers which cannot do lockless config access with !PCI_LOCKLESS_CONFIG"
Previous message: Stephen Rothwell: "linux-next: duplicate patches in the bluetooth tree"
In reply to: Caleb Sander Mateos: "[PATCH v2 01/19] blk-integrity: take const pointer in blk_integrity_rq()"
Next in thread: Caleb Sander Mateos: "[PATCH v2 11/19] ublk: optimize ublk_user_copy() on daemon task"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]