Re: [PATCH v1 3/9] exfat: reuse cache to improve exfat_get_cluster
From: Chi Zhiling
Date: Sun Jan 04 2026 - 22:08:07 EST
On 1/4/26 15:56, Yuezhang.Mo@xxxxxxxx wrote:
On 12/30/25 17:05, Yuezhang.Mo@xxxxxxxx wrote:
- if (exfat_ent_get(sb, *dclus, &content, NULL))
- return -EIO;
+ if (exfat_ent_get(sb, *dclus, &content, &bh))
+ goto err;
As you commented, the buffer_head needs release if no error return.
Here, an error was returned, buffer_head had been released.
I mean, it seems like a duplicate release in there, but in fact it's not.
When exfat_ent_get return an error, *bh is released and set to NULL. So
the second brelse() call in exfat_get_cluster() does nothing.
~~~
int exfat_ent_get(struct super_block *sb, unsigned int loc,
unsigned int *content, struct buffer_head **last)
{
...
err:
if (last) {
brelse(*last);
/* Avoid double release */
*last = NULL;
}
return -EIO;
}
~~~
The reason using "goto err" is that I want to handle all errors in the
same way. Although this does seem a bit strange and confusing with the
comment in exfat_ent_get.
I don't think it's necessary to handle all errors in the same way.
- Only the following error handling requires calling brelse.
/* prevent the infinite loop of cluster chain */
if (fclus > limit) {
exfat_fs_error(sb,
"detected the cluster chain loop (i_pos %u)",
fclus);
goto err;
}
- This makes confused with the comment in exfat_ent_get.
- Unnecessary code modifications are avoided.
Okay, V2 is ready:
diff --git a/fs/exfat/cache.c b/fs/exfat/cache.c
index 61af3fa05ab7..a5e6858e5a20 100644
--- a/fs/exfat/cache.c
+++ b/fs/exfat/cache.c
@@ -241,6 +241,7 @@ int exfat_get_cluster(struct inode *inode, unsigned
int cluster,
struct exfat_sb_info *sbi = EXFAT_SB(sb);
unsigned int limit = sbi->num_clusters;
struct exfat_inode_info *ei = EXFAT_I(inode);
+ struct buffer_head *bh = NULL;
struct exfat_cache_id cid;
unsigned int content;
@@ -284,10 +285,10 @@ int exfat_get_cluster(struct inode *inode,
unsigned int cluster,
exfat_fs_error(sb,
"detected the cluster chain loop (i_pos
%u)",
(*fclus));
- return -EIO;
+ goto err;
}
- if (exfat_ent_get(sb, *dclus, &content, NULL))
+ if (exfat_ent_get(sb, *dclus, &content, &bh))
return -EIO;
*last_dclus = *dclus;
@@ -299,7 +300,7 @@ int exfat_get_cluster(struct inode *inode, unsigned
int cluster,
exfat_fs_error(sb,
"invalid cluster chain (i_pos
%u, last_clus 0x%08x is EOF)",
*fclus, (*last_dclus));
- return -EIO;
+ goto err; // will remove in patch 6/9
}
break;
@@ -309,6 +310,10 @@ int exfat_get_cluster(struct inode *inode, unsigned
int cluster,
cache_init(&cid, *fclus, *dclus);
}
+ brelse(bh);
exfat_cache_add(inode, &cid);
return 0;
+err:
+ brelse(bh);
+ return -EIO;
}
Thanks,
*last_dclus = *dclus;
*dclus = content;
@@ -299,7 +300,7 @@ int exfat_get_cluster(struct inode *inode, unsigned int cluster,
exfat_fs_error(sb,
"invalid cluster chain (i_pos %u, last_clus 0x%08x is EOF)",
*fclus, (*last_dclus));
- return -EIO;
+ goto err;
}
break;
@@ -309,6 +310,10 @@ int exfat_get_cluster(struct inode *inode, unsigned int cluster,
cache_init(&cid, *fclus, *dclus);
}
+ brelse(bh);
exfat_cache_add(inode, &cid);
return 0;
+err:
+ brelse(bh);
+ return -EIO;
}