Re: [PATCH v2 02/15] docs: dma-api: document __dma_from_device_group_begin()/end()

[Marek Szyprowski]

On 05.01.2026 09:22, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Document the __dma_from_device_group_begin()/end() annotations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   Documentation/core-api/dma-api-howto.rst | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)

Acked-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>

> diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/dma-api-howto.rst b/Documentation/core-api/dma-api-howto.rst
> index 96fce2a9aa90..e97743ab0f26 100644
> --- a/Documentation/core-api/dma-api-howto.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/core-api/dma-api-howto.rst
> @@ -146,6 +146,58 @@ What about block I/O and networking buffers?  The block I/O and
>   networking subsystems make sure that the buffers they use are valid
>   for you to DMA from/to.
>   
> +__dma_from_device_group_begin/end annotations
> +=============================================
> +
> +As explained previously, when a structure contains a DMA_FROM_DEVICE /
> +DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL buffer (device writes to memory) alongside fields that the
> +CPU writes to, cache line sharing between the DMA buffer and CPU-written fields
> +can cause data corruption on CPUs with DMA-incoherent caches.
> +
> +The ``__dma_from_device_group_begin(GROUP)/__dma_from_device_group_end(GROUP)``
> +macros ensure proper alignment to prevent this::
> +
> +	struct my_device {
> +		spinlock_t lock1;
> +		__dma_from_device_group_begin();
> +		char dma_buffer1[16];
> +		char dma_buffer2[16];
> +		__dma_from_device_group_end();
> +		spinlock_t lock2;
> +	};
> +
> +To isolate a DMA buffer from adjacent fields, use
> +``__dma_from_device_group_begin(GROUP)`` before the first DMA buffer
> +field and ``__dma_from_device_group_end(GROUP)`` after the last DMA
> +buffer field (with the same GROUP name). This protects both the head
> +and tail of the buffer from cache line sharing.
> +
> +The GROUP parameter is an optional identifier that names the DMA buffer group
> +(in case you have several in the same structure)::
> +
> +	struct my_device {
> +		spinlock_t lock1;
> +		__dma_from_device_group_begin(buffer1);
> +		char dma_buffer1[16];
> +		__dma_from_device_group_end(buffer1);
> +		spinlock_t lock2;
> +		__dma_from_device_group_begin(buffer2);
> +		char dma_buffer2[16];
> +		__dma_from_device_group_end(buffer2);
> +	};
> +
> +On cache-coherent platforms these macros expand to zero-length array markers.
> +On non-coherent platforms, they also ensure the minimal DMA alignment, which
> +can be as large as 128 bytes.
> +
> +.. note::
> +
> +        It is allowed (though somewhat fragile) to include extra fields, not
> +        intended for DMA from the device, within the group (in order to pack the
> +        structure tightly) - but only as long as the CPU does not write these
> +        fields while any fields in the group are mapped for DMA_FROM_DEVICE or
> +        DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL.
> +
>   DMA addressing capabilities
>   ===========================
>   

Best regards
-- 
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland