Re: [PATCH v6] mm/vmscan: fix demotion targets checks in reclaim/demotion

[Gregory Price]

On Tue, Jan 06, 2026 at 07:56:54AM +0000, Bing Jiao wrote:
> 
> Bug 1 reproduction:
>   Assume a system with 4 nodes, where nodes 0-1 are top-tier and
>   nodes 2-3 are far-tier memory. All nodes have equal capacity.
> 
>   Test script:
>     echo 1 > /sys/kernel/mm/numa/demotion_enabled
>     mkdir /sys/fs/cgroup/test
>     echo +cpuset > /sys/fs/cgroup/cgroup.subtree_control
>     echo "0-2" > /sys/fs/cgroup/test/cpuset.mems
>     echo $$ > /sys/fs/cgroup/test/cgroup.procs
>     swapoff -a
>     # Expectation: Should respect node 0-2 limit.
>     # Observation: Node 3 shows significant allocation (MemFree drops)
>     stress-ng --oomable --vm 1 --vm-bytes 150% --mbind 0,1
> 
> Bug 2 reproduction:
>   Assume a system with 6 nodes, where nodes 0-2 are top-tier,
>   node 3 is a far-tier node, and nodes 4-5 are the farthest-tier nodes.
>   All nodes have equal capacity.
> 
>   Test script:
>     echo 1 > /sys/kernel/mm/numa/demotion_enabled
>     mkdir /sys/fs/cgroup/test
>     echo +cpuset > /sys/fs/cgroup/cgroup.subtree_control
>     echo "0-2,4-5" > /sys/fs/cgroup/test/cpuset.mems
>     echo $$ > /sys/fs/cgroup/test/cgroup.procs
>     swapoff -a
>     # Expectation: Pages are demoted to Nodes 4-5
>     # Observation: No pages are demoted before oom.
>     stress-ng --oomable --vm 1 --vm-bytes 150% --mbind 0,1,2
> 
> Fixes: 7d709f49babc ("vmscan,cgroup: apply mems_effective to reclaim")
> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Bing Jiao <bingjiao@xxxxxxxxxx>

This looks ok now, haven't tested it myself yet, but looks good.

Thank you for the fix.

Reviewed-by: Gregory Price <gourry@xxxxxxxxxx>

~Gregory