Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: SVM: Raise #UD if VMMCALL instruction is not intercepted

From: Yosry Ahmed

Date: Tue Jan 06 2026 - 18:32:11 EST


On Tue, Jan 06, 2026 at 10:29:59AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2026, Kevin Cheng wrote:
> > The AMD APM states that if VMMCALL instruction is not intercepted, the
> > instruction raises a #UD exception.
> >
> > Create a vmmcall exit handler that generates a #UD if a VMMCALL exit
> > from L2 is being handled by L0, which means that L1 did not intercept
> > the VMMCALL instruction.
> >
> > Co-developed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Co-developed-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Co-developed-by requires a SoB. As Yosry noted off-list, he only provided the
> comment, and I have feedback on that :-) Unless Yosry objects, just drop his.
> Co-developed-by.

Yup, no objections.

>
> Ditt for me, just give me
>
> Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I don't need a Co-developed-by for a tossing a code snippet your way. though I
> appreciate the offer. :-)
>
> > Signed-off-by: Kevin Cheng <chengkev@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> > index fc1b8707bb00c..482495ad72d22 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> > @@ -3179,6 +3179,20 @@ static int bus_lock_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static int vmmcall_interception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > +{
> > + /*
> > + * If VMMCALL from L2 is not intercepted by L1, the instruction raises a
> > + * #UD exception
> > + */
>
> Mentioning L2 and L1 is confusing. It reads like arbitrary KVM behavior. And
> IMO the most notable thing is what's missing: an intercept check. _That_ is
> worth commenting, e.g.
>
> /*
> * VMMCALL #UDs if it's not intercepted, and KVM reaches this point if
> * and only if the VMCALL intercept is not set in vmcb12.

Nit: VMMCALL

> */
>

Would it be too paranoid to WARN if the L1 intercept is set here?

WARN_ON_ONCE(vmcb12_is_intercept(&svm->nested.ctl, INTERCEPT_VMMCALL));

> > + if (is_guest_mode(vcpu)) {
> > + kvm_queue_exception(vcpu, UD_VECTOR);
> > + return 1;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return kvm_emulate_hypercall(vcpu);
> > +}
> > +
> > static int (*const svm_exit_handlers[])(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) = {
> > [SVM_EXIT_READ_CR0] = cr_interception,
> > [SVM_EXIT_READ_CR3] = cr_interception,
> > @@ -3229,7 +3243,7 @@ static int (*const svm_exit_handlers[])(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) = {
> > [SVM_EXIT_TASK_SWITCH] = task_switch_interception,
> > [SVM_EXIT_SHUTDOWN] = shutdown_interception,
> > [SVM_EXIT_VMRUN] = vmrun_interception,
> > - [SVM_EXIT_VMMCALL] = kvm_emulate_hypercall,
> > + [SVM_EXIT_VMMCALL] = vmmcall_interception,
> > [SVM_EXIT_VMLOAD] = vmload_interception,
> > [SVM_EXIT_VMSAVE] = vmsave_interception,
> > [SVM_EXIT_STGI] = stgi_interception,
> > --
> > 2.52.0.351.gbe84eed79e-goog
> >