Re: [PATCH] perf Documentation: Correct branch stack sampling call-stack option

[Mi, Dapeng]

@Arnaldo, @Kim, @Ian

Kindly ping ... 

On 12/16/2025 9:39 AM, Dapeng Mi wrote:
> The correct call-stack option for branch stack sampling should be "stack"
> instead of "call_stack". Correct it.
>
> $perf record -e instructions -j call_stack -- sleep 1
> unknown branch filter call_stack, check man page
>
>  Usage: perf record [<options>] [<command>]
>     or: perf record [<options>] -- <command> [<options>]
>
>     -j, --branch-filter <branch filter mask>
>                           branch stack filter modes
>
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fixes: 955f6def5590 ("perf record: Add remaining branch filters: "no_cycles", "no_flags" & "hw_index"")
> Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  tools/perf/Documentation/perf-record.txt | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-record.txt b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-record.txt
> index e8b9aadbbfa5..3d19e77c9c53 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-record.txt
> +++ b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-record.txt
> @@ -454,7 +454,7 @@ following filters are defined:
>  	- no_tx: only when the target is not in a hardware transaction
>  	- abort_tx: only when the target is a hardware transaction abort
>  	- cond: conditional branches
> -	- call_stack: save call stack
> +	- stack: save call stack
>  	- no_flags: don't save branch flags e.g prediction, misprediction etc
>  	- no_cycles: don't save branch cycles
>  	- hw_index: save branch hardware index
>
> base-commit: cb015814f8b6eebcbb8e46e111d108892c5e6821