Re: [PATCH v3 00/24] KVM: TDX huge page support for private memory

[Edgecombe, Rick P]

On Tue, 2026-01-06 at 15:43 -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Mapping a hugepage for memory that KVM _knows_ is contiguous and homogenous is
> conceptually totally fine, i.e. I'm not totally opposed to adding support for
> mapping multiple guest_memfd folios with a single hugepage.   As to whether we
> do (a) nothing, (b) change the refcounting, or (c) add support for mapping
> multiple folios in one page, probably comes down to which option provides "good
> enough" performance without incurring too much complexity.

Can we add "whether we can push it off to the future" to the considerations
list? The in-flight gmem stuff is pretty complex and this doesn't seem to have
an ABI intersection.