Re: [PATCH net 2/2] net: ethernet: ave: Replace udelay with usleep_range
From: David Laight
Date: Thu Jan 08 2026 - 06:35:05 EST
On Thu, 8 Jan 2026 15:46:41 +0900
Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Replace udelay() with usleep_range() as notified by checkpatch.pl.
Nak.
Look at the code...
>
> CHECK: usleep_range is preferred over udelay; see function description
> of usleep_range() and udelay().
> #906: FILE: drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/sni_ave.c:906:
> + udelay(50);
>
> Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/sni_ave.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/sni_ave.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/sni_ave.c
> index 4700998c4837..a3735d81a862 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/sni_ave.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/sni_ave.c
> @@ -903,11 +903,11 @@ static void ave_rxfifo_reset(struct net_device *ndev)
>
> /* assert reset */
> writel(AVE_GRR_RXFFR, priv->base + AVE_GRR);
> - udelay(50);
> + usleep_range(50, 100);
>
> /* negate reset */
> writel(0, priv->base + AVE_GRR);
> - udelay(20);
> + usleep_range(20, 40);
>
> /* negate interrupt status */
> writel(AVE_GI_RXOVF, priv->base + AVE_GISR);