Re: [PATCH] softirq: Print the function name

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Tue, Jan 06 2026 at 14:16, enlin.mu wrote:
> On 2026/1/5 17:41, Enlin Mu wrote:
>> Adjust the printing format from the function address to
>> the function name.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Enlin Mu <enlin.mu@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Enlin Mu <enlin.mu@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>   kernel/softirq.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
>> index 77198911b8dd..68ef18616fb9 100644
>> --- a/kernel/softirq.c
>> +++ b/kernel/softirq.c
>> @@ -622,7 +622,7 @@ static void handle_softirqs(bool ksirqd)
>>   		h->action();
>>   		trace_softirq_exit(vec_nr);
>>   		if (unlikely(prev_count != preempt_count())) {
>> -			pr_err("huh, entered softirq %u %s %p with preempt_count %08x, exited with %08x?\n",
>> +			pr_err("huh, entered softirq %u %s %pS with preempt_count %08x, exited with %08x?\n",
>>   			       vec_nr, softirq_to_name[vec_nr], h->action,
>>   			       prev_count, preempt_count());
>
> Hi All
>
> My test results are as follows:
>
> before this patch:
>
> [   49.919574] softirq: huh, entered softirq 1 TIMER 00000000bb45ef3a 
> with preempt_count 00000101, exited with 00000101?
>
>
> after this patch:
>
> [   49.919570] softirq: huh, entered softirq 1 TIMER 
> run_timer_softirq+0x0/0x108 with preempt_count 00000101, exited with 
> 00000102?

The TIMER softirq always invoked run_timer_softirq(). If that happens
then the interesting question is not the softirq action handler, but any
function it invoked from there. So there is _zero_ value of adding this.

Thanks,

        tglx