Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: usb: parade,ps5511: Disallow unevaluated properties
From: Rob Herring
Date: Mon Jan 12 2026 - 18:17:44 EST
On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 2:20 PM Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 10:01:50AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > Review given to v2 [1] of commit fc259b024cb3 ("dt-bindings: usb: Add
> > binding for PS5511 hub controller") asked to use unevaluatedProperties,
> > but this was ignored by the author probably because current dtschema
> > does not allow to use both additionalProperties and
> > unevaluatedProperties. As an effect, this binding does not end with
> > unevaluatedProperties and allows any properties to be added.
> >
> > Fix this by reverting the approach suggested at v2 review and using
> > simpler definition of "reg" constraints.
> >
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250416180023.GB3327258-robh@xxxxxxxxxx/ [1]
> > Fixes: fc259b024cb3 ("dt-bindings: usb: Add binding for PS5511 hub controller")
> > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/usb/parade,ps5511.yaml | 12 ++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/parade,ps5511.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/parade,ps5511.yaml
> > index 10d002f09db8..154d779e507a 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/parade,ps5511.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/parade,ps5511.yaml
> > @@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ properties:
> > - usb1da0,5511
> > - usb1da0,55a1
> >
> > + reg:
> > + minimum: 1
> > + maximum: 5
> > +
>
> This 'reg' would be the upstream USB port. We have no idea what its
> constraints are for the value.
>
> > reset-gpios:
> > items:
> > - description: GPIO specifier for RESETB pin.
> > @@ -41,12 +45,6 @@ properties:
> > minimum: 1
> > maximum: 5
> >
> > -additionalProperties:
> > - properties:
> > - reg:
> > - minimum: 1
> > - maximum: 5
>
> Removing this is wrong. This is defining the number of downstream USB
> ports for this hub.
>
> What's wrong here is 'type: object' is missing, so any property that's
> not a object passes (no, 'properties' doesn't imply it's an object).
>
> We should fix dtschema to allow additionalProperties when not a
> boolean property to coexist with unevaluatedProperties. I'll look into
> it.
Actually, allowing both wouldn't make sense here.
If you rely on usb-hub.yaml (via usb-device.yaml) to define 'reg', the
additionalProperties schema is still going to be applied to 'reg' as
unevaluatedProperties has no impact on it. That would happen to work
since there's no 'type: object'.
I think the additionalProperties should be a patternProperties instead
because we need to define the unit-address format:
patternProperties:
'@[1-5$':
type: object
...
Rob