Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add Rust files to STATIC BRANCH/CALL and TRACING

From: Steven Rostedt

Date: Mon Jan 12 2026 - 10:00:13 EST


On Sun, 11 Jan 2026 19:36:29 +0100
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 7, 2026 at 1:32 PM Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > I'm proposing to include them under the existing entries, as that seems
> > like the most obvious place to include them. However, there are multiple
> > ways to do this. If you prefer to have them elsewhere, I would also be
> > happy to create a new entry with me as maintaining them, or I'm also
> > willing to be listed as R: under the entry. Regardless of how we list
> > them in MAINTAINERS, I will be around if anything comes up. Let me know
> > what you all prefer.
>
> I think this was meant to go after the `---`?
>
> Whatever Steven et al. are happy with, this looks fine, thanks!
>
> Acked-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@xxxxxxxxxx>
>

I guess the question is are those with expertise on the list of people to
Cc?

I think it may be better to have a separate section for RUST so that the
rust maintainers can be included in the M: part too. Perhaps:

STATIC BRANCH/CALL (RUST)

and

TRACING (RUST)

And have the M of the other sections be R here?

-- Steve