Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/virt/tdx: Retrieve TDX module version

[Dave Hansen]

On 1/11/26 18:25, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
> ... I know it's because minor_version has the least field ID among the
> three. But the order of the field IDs doesn't stand for the order of the
> reading. Reading the middle part y of x.y.z as first step looks a bit odd.

I wouldn't sweat it either way. Reading 4, 3, 5 would also look odd. I'm
fine with it as-is in the patch.