Re: [Patch v2 1/7] perf/x86/intel: Support the 4 new OMR MSRs introduced in DMR and NVL

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 01:16:43PM +0800, Dapeng Mi wrote:

> ISE link: https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/content-details/869288/intel-architecture-instruction-set-extensions-programming-reference.html

Does intel guarantee this link is stable? If not, it is not appropriate
to stick in a changelog that will live 'forever'.


> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> index 1840ca1918d1..6ea3260f6422 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> @@ -3532,17 +3532,28 @@ static int intel_alt_er(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
>  	struct extra_reg *extra_regs = hybrid(cpuc->pmu, extra_regs);
>  	int alt_idx = idx;
>  
> -	if (!(x86_pmu.flags & PMU_FL_HAS_RSP_1))
> -		return idx;
> -
> -	if (idx == EXTRA_REG_RSP_0)
> -		alt_idx = EXTRA_REG_RSP_1;
> -
> -	if (idx == EXTRA_REG_RSP_1)
> -		alt_idx = EXTRA_REG_RSP_0;
> +	if (idx == EXTRA_REG_RSP_0 || idx == EXTRA_REG_RSP_1) {
> +		if (!(x86_pmu.flags & PMU_FL_HAS_RSP_1))
> +			return idx;
> +		if (++alt_idx > EXTRA_REG_RSP_1)
> +			alt_idx = EXTRA_REG_RSP_0;
> +		if (config & ~extra_regs[alt_idx].valid_mask)
> +			return idx;
> +	}
>  
> -	if (config & ~extra_regs[alt_idx].valid_mask)
> -		return idx;
> +	if (idx >= EXTRA_REG_OMR_0 && idx <= EXTRA_REG_OMR_3) {
> +		if (!(x86_pmu.flags & PMU_FL_HAS_OMR))
> +			return idx;
> +		if (++alt_idx > EXTRA_REG_OMR_3)
> +			alt_idx = EXTRA_REG_OMR_0;
> +		/*
> +		 * Subtracting EXTRA_REG_OMR_0 ensures to get correct
> +		 * OMR extra_reg entries which start from 0.
> +		 */
> +		if (config &
> +		    ~extra_regs[alt_idx - EXTRA_REG_OMR_0].valid_mask)
> +			return idx;
> +	}
>  
>  	return alt_idx;
>  }
> @@ -3550,16 +3561,24 @@ static int intel_alt_er(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
>  static void intel_fixup_er(struct perf_event *event, int idx)
>  {
>  	struct extra_reg *extra_regs = hybrid(event->pmu, extra_regs);
> -	event->hw.extra_reg.idx = idx;
> +	int er_idx;
>  
> -	if (idx == EXTRA_REG_RSP_0) {
> -		event->hw.config &= ~INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK;
> -		event->hw.config |= extra_regs[EXTRA_REG_RSP_0].event;
> -		event->hw.extra_reg.reg = MSR_OFFCORE_RSP_0;
> -	} else if (idx == EXTRA_REG_RSP_1) {
> +	event->hw.extra_reg.idx = idx;
> +	switch (idx) {
> +	case EXTRA_REG_RSP_0 ... EXTRA_REG_RSP_1:
> +		er_idx = idx - EXTRA_REG_RSP_0;
>  		event->hw.config &= ~INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK;
> -		event->hw.config |= extra_regs[EXTRA_REG_RSP_1].event;
> -		event->hw.extra_reg.reg = MSR_OFFCORE_RSP_1;
> +		event->hw.config |= extra_regs[er_idx].event;
> +		event->hw.extra_reg.reg = MSR_OFFCORE_RSP_0 + er_idx;
> +		break;
> +	case EXTRA_REG_OMR_0 ... EXTRA_REG_OMR_3:
> +		er_idx = idx - EXTRA_REG_OMR_0;
> +		event->hw.config &= ~ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_UMASK;
> +		event->hw.config |= 1ULL << (8 + er_idx);
> +		event->hw.extra_reg.reg = MSR_OMR_0 + er_idx;
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		pr_warn("The extra reg idx %d is not supported.\n", idx);
>  	}
>  }

I found it jarring to have these two functions so dissimilar; I've
changed both to be a switch statement.

---
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -3532,16 +3532,17 @@ static int intel_alt_er(struct cpu_hw_ev
 	struct extra_reg *extra_regs = hybrid(cpuc->pmu, extra_regs);
 	int alt_idx = idx;
 
-	if (idx == EXTRA_REG_RSP_0 || idx == EXTRA_REG_RSP_1) {
+	switch (idx) {
+	case EXTRA_REG_RSP_0 ... EXTRA_REG_RSP_1:
 		if (!(x86_pmu.flags & PMU_FL_HAS_RSP_1))
 			return idx;
 		if (++alt_idx > EXTRA_REG_RSP_1)
 			alt_idx = EXTRA_REG_RSP_0;
 		if (config & ~extra_regs[alt_idx].valid_mask)
 			return idx;
-	}
+		break;
 
-	if (idx >= EXTRA_REG_OMR_0 && idx <= EXTRA_REG_OMR_3) {
+	case EXTRA_REG_OMR_0 ... EXTRA_REG_OMR_3:
 		if (!(x86_pmu.flags & PMU_FL_HAS_OMR))
 			return idx;
 		if (++alt_idx > EXTRA_REG_OMR_3)
@@ -3550,9 +3551,12 @@ static int intel_alt_er(struct cpu_hw_ev
 		 * Subtracting EXTRA_REG_OMR_0 ensures to get correct
 		 * OMR extra_reg entries which start from 0.
 		 */
-		if (config &
-		    ~extra_regs[alt_idx - EXTRA_REG_OMR_0].valid_mask)
+		if (config & ~extra_regs[alt_idx - EXTRA_REG_OMR_0].valid_mask)
 			return idx;
+		break;
+
+	default:
+		break;
 	}
 
 	return alt_idx;
@@ -3571,12 +3575,14 @@ static void intel_fixup_er(struct perf_e
 		event->hw.config |= extra_regs[er_idx].event;
 		event->hw.extra_reg.reg = MSR_OFFCORE_RSP_0 + er_idx;
 		break;
+
 	case EXTRA_REG_OMR_0 ... EXTRA_REG_OMR_3:
 		er_idx = idx - EXTRA_REG_OMR_0;
 		event->hw.config &= ~ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_UMASK;
 		event->hw.config |= 1ULL << (8 + er_idx);
 		event->hw.extra_reg.reg = MSR_OMR_0 + er_idx;
 		break;
+
 	default:
 		pr_warn("The extra reg idx %d is not supported.\n", idx);
 	}