Re: [PATCH bpf-next v8 05/11] bpf: support fsession for bpf_session_cookie

[Menglong Dong]

On 2026/1/10 10:42, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2026 at 6:26 PM Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> > +u64 *bpf_fsession_cookie(void *ctx)
> > +{
> > +       /* This helper call is inlined by verifier. */
> > +       u64 off = (((u64 *)ctx)[-1] >> BPF_TRAMP_M_COOKIE) & 0xFF;
> > +
> > +       return &((u64 *)ctx)[-off];
> > +}
> 
> Same question... this can be a comment.
> For some of the helpers earlier we kept C functions to make
> things work on architectures where JIT is not available,
> but kfuncs require JIT, so for kfuncs there is no fallback necessary.

Yeah, it make sense.

> 
>