Re: [PATCH v9 0/2] mm/vmscan: fix demotion targets checks in reclaim/demotion

[Andrew Morton]

On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 20:53:01 +0000 Bing Jiao <bingjiao@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I’m resubmitting the full refreshed patch series together this time.
> I just realized it is better to include the unmodified patches alongside
> the modified ones to ensure compatibility with upstream automated tools
> and to simplify your review process.

No probs.

[1/2] is cc:stable whereas [2/2] is not.  Ordinarily that means I must
split the series apart (they take different routes) and often discard
the [0/n].

In this case I think I'll leave things as-is, so [1/2]'s entry into the
-stable pipeline will occur a few weeks later.  I don't think the
problem is serious enough to need super-fast-tracking?  

Hopefully this approach means we'll get some Reviewed-bys ;)