Re: [PATCH v8 0/8] gpio: renesas: Add support for GPIO and related interrupts in RZ/N1 SoC

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 at 23:21, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 4:47 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 at 11:03, Wolfram Sang
> > <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > Rob, Thomas, this series is blocked waiting for your feedback and your
> > > > acks if you are okay.
> > >
> > > This was a little hidden between the other text, so let me emphasize
> > > that these acks are needed. The other option is to send the irq stuff
> > > and the SoC stuff seperately.
>
> Reviewed-by > Acked-by

It does have different semantics...

> And if it has either, I stop paying attention. So I was assuming this
> all was going in via not-my-tree...
>
> > The irq and SoC stuff depend on the of stuff, so doing so would
> > delay the former by one cycle.
> >
> > On IRC, Rob sort of agreed to option A from my proposal (see v7 cover
> > letter):
> >
> >   A. Rob takes the first two patches, and provides an immutable branch.
> >      Then Thomas takes the irqchip patches, and I take the rest.
>
> Until this...
>
> > Unfortunately that part hasn't happened yet...
>
> And then a new version came in... Why a new version only to add a
> Tested-by tag? That sends you to the back of the queue in my normal
> workflow (which this is turning into anything but).
>
> Thomas has now provided a Reviewed-by. I think it is easiest if you
> just take the whole series via Renesas tree.

OK doing so...
Thanks!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds