Re: [PATCH] KVM: SVM: Fix redundant updates of LBR MSR intercepts

[Sean Christopherson]

On Mon, Dec 15, 2025, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 11:38:00AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 15, 2025, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 07:26:54PM +0000, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> > > > svm_update_lbrv() always updates LBR MSRs intercepts, even when they are
> > > > already set correctly. This results in force_msr_bitmap_recalc always
> > > > being set to true on every nested transition, essentially undoing the
> > > > hyperv optimization in nested_svm_merge_msrpm().
> > > > 
> > > > Fix it by keeping track of whether LBR MSRs are intercepted or not and
> > > > only doing the update if needed, similar to x2avic_msrs_intercepted.
> > > > 
> > > > Avoid using svm_test_msr_bitmap_*() to check the status of the
> > > > intercepts, as an arbitrary MSR will need to be chosen as a
> > > > representative of all LBR MSRs, and this could theoretically break if
> > > > some of the MSRs intercepts are handled differently from the rest.
> > > > 
> > > > Also, using svm_test_msr_bitmap_*() makes backports difficult as it was
> > > > only recently introduced with no direct alternatives in older kernels.
> > > > 
> > > > Fixes: fbe5e5f030c2 ("KVM: nSVM: Always recalculate LBR MSR intercepts in svm_update_lbrv()")
> > > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > Sigh.. I had this patch file in my working directory and it was sent by
> > > mistake with the series, as the cover letter nonetheless. Sorry about
> > > that. Let me know if I should resend.
> > 
> > Eh, it's fine for now.  The important part is clarfying that this patch should
> > be ignored, which you've already done.
> 
> FWIW that patch is already in Linus's tree so even if someone applies
> it, it should be fine.

Narrator: it wasn't fine.

Please resend this series.  The base-commit is garbage because your working tree
was polluted with non-public patches, I can't quickly figure out what your "real"
base was, and I don't have the bandwidth to manually work through the mess.

In the future, please, please don't post patches against a non-public base.  It
adds a lot of friction on my end, and your series are quite literally the only
ones I've had problems with in the last ~6 months.