Re: [RFC PATCH] fs/hfs: fix ABBA deadlock in hfs_mdb_commit
From: Jinchao Wang
Date: Tue Jan 13 2026 - 22:03:38 EST
On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 08:52:45PM +0000, Viacheslav Dubeyko wrote:
> On Tue, 2026-01-13 at 16:19 +0800, Jinchao Wang wrote:
> > syzbot reported a hung task in hfs_mdb_commit where a deadlock occurs
> > between the MDB buffer lock and the folio lock.
> >
> > The deadlock happens because hfs_mdb_commit() holds the mdb_bh
> > lock while calling sb_bread(), which attempts to acquire the lock
> > on the same folio.
>
> I don't quite to follow to your logic. We have only one sb_bread() [1] in
> hfs_mdb_commit(). This read is trying to extract the volume bitmap. How is it
> possible that superblock and volume bitmap is located at the same folio? Are you
> sure? Which size of the folio do you imply here?
>
> Also, it your logic is correct, then we never could be able to mount/unmount or
> run any operations on HFS volumes because of likewise deadlock. However, I can
> run xfstests on HFS volume.
>
> [1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.19-rc5/source/fs/hfs/mdb.c#L324
Hi Viacheslav,
After reviewing your feedback, I realized that my previous RFC was not in
the correct format. It was not intended to be a final, merge-ready patch,
but rather a record of the analysis and trial fixes conducted so far.
I apologize for the confusion caused by my previous email.
The details are reorganized as follows:
- Observation
- Analysis
- Verification
- Conclusion
Observation
============
Syzbot report: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=1e3ff4b07c16ca0f6fe2
For this version:
| time | kernel | Commit | Syzkaller |
| 2025/12/20 17:03 | linux-next | cc3aa43b44bd | d6526ea3 |
Crash log: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/text?tag=CrashLog&x=12909b1a580000
The report indicates hung tasks within the hfs context.
Analysis
========
In the crash log, the lockdep information requires adjustment based on the call stack.
After adjustment, a deadlock is identified:
task syz.1.1902:8009
- held &disk->open_mutex
- held foio lock
- wait lock_buffer(bh)
Partial call trace:
->blkdev_writepages()
->writeback_iter()
->writeback_get_folio()
->folio_lock(folio)
->block_write_full_folio()
__block_write_full_folio()
->lock_buffer(bh)
task syz.0.1904:8010
- held &type->s_umount_key#66 down_read
- held lock_buffer(HFS_SB(sb)->mdb_bh);
- wait folio
Partial call trace:
hfs_mdb_commit
->lock_buffer(HFS_SB(sb)->mdb_bh);
->bh = sb_bread(sb, block);
...->folio_lock(folio)
Other hung tasks are secondary effects of this deadlock. The issue
is reproducible in my local environment usuing the syz-reproducer.
Verification
==============
Two patches are verified against the syz-reproducer.
Neither reproduce the deadlock.
Option 1: Removing `un/lock_buffer(HFS_SB(sb)->mdb_bh)`
------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/fs/hfs/mdb.c b/fs/hfs/mdb.c
index 53f3fae60217..c641adb94e6f 100644
--- a/fs/hfs/mdb.c
+++ b/fs/hfs/mdb.c
@@ -268,7 +268,6 @@ void hfs_mdb_commit(struct super_block *sb)
if (sb_rdonly(sb))
return;
- lock_buffer(HFS_SB(sb)->mdb_bh);
if (test_and_clear_bit(HFS_FLG_MDB_DIRTY, &HFS_SB(sb)->flags)) {
/* These parameters may have been modified, so write them back */
mdb->drLsMod = hfs_mtime();
@@ -340,7 +339,6 @@ void hfs_mdb_commit(struct super_block *sb)
size -= len;
}
}
- unlock_buffer(HFS_SB(sb)->mdb_bh);
}
Options 2: Moving `unlock_buffer(HFS_SB(sb)->mdb_bh)`
--------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/fs/hfs/mdb.c b/fs/hfs/mdb.c
index 53f3fae60217..ec534c630c7e 100644
--- a/fs/hfs/mdb.c
+++ b/fs/hfs/mdb.c
@@ -309,6 +309,7 @@ void hfs_mdb_commit(struct super_block *sb)
sync_dirty_buffer(HFS_SB(sb)->alt_mdb_bh);
}
+ unlock_buffer(HFS_SB(sb)->mdb_bh);
if (test_and_clear_bit(HFS_FLG_BITMAP_DIRTY, &HFS_SB(sb)->flags)) {
struct buffer_head *bh;
sector_t block;
@@ -340,7 +341,6 @@ void hfs_mdb_commit(struct super_block *sb)
size -= len;
}
}
- unlock_buffer(HFS_SB(sb)->mdb_bh);
}
Conclusion
==========
The analysis and verification confirms that the hung tasks are caused by
the deadlock between `lock_buffer(HFS_SB(sb)->mdb_bh)` and `sb_bread(sb, block)`.