Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] dt-bindings: can: renesas,rcar-canfd: Document RZ/T2H and RZ/N2H SoCs

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 13/01/2026 20:25, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jan 2026 at 18:22, Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 4:30 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On 12/01/2026 15:04, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
>>>>   - if:
>>>>       properties:
>>>>         compatible:
>>>>           contains:
>>>>             # SoCs WITH resets but WITHOUT reset-names
>>>>             enum:
>>>>               - renesas,rcar-gen3-canfd
>>>>               - renesas,rcar-gen4-canfd
>>>>     then:
>>>>       required:
>>>>         - resets
>>>>       properties:
>>>>         reset-names: false
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, although now I wonder why do you have such case... There are no
>>> benefits in disallowing reset-names, even for single entries.
> 
> Except that I have no idea which of the two names I should use in
> case of renesas,rcar-gen3-canfd and renesas,rcar-gen4-canfd, as
> the hardware documentation doesn't explain that?  AFAIU it is just
> a single, common reset for the whole block...
So there is a reason why reset-names should be disallowed :). It's fine
then.

Best regards,
Krzysztof