Re: [PATCH] [v5] Documentation: Provide guidelines for tool-generated content

[dan.j.williams]

Sasha Levin wrote:
[..]
> With a rule like the above, 1700+ contributors would have not been able to send
> their patch in.

Good point, I am not suggesting a Reviewed-by hurdle, but can see it
reading that way. I expect that there will always be a significant class
of contributions that will never need author trust to be accepted. Yes,
would need to be careful not to destroy that wellspring of new
contributors.