Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add support for Gunyah Watchdog

[Mukesh Ojha]

On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 04:55:56PM +0000, Alexander Koskovich wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tuesday, January 13th, 2026 at 11:47 AM, Mukesh Ojha <mukesh.ojha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Just to clarify you said, there is no issue if you just use dtb and not use dtbo ?
> > And issue happen when you start using a dtbo, even a dummy one, right ?
> 
> Yeah, the cases are as follows:
> 
> dtb only (no arch_timer label) = boots
> dtb (no arch_timer label) + dtbo = fails
> dtb (has arch_timer label) + dtbo = boots

Yes, this is expected..some nodes in dtb is expected which
gets patched during boot up.

https://gitlab.incom.co/cm-ayn/android_kernel_ayn_kernel/-/commit/7ae6565108654991aaac9b73a2221509511e59d3

One of the reason, you will see below change to fix one of the expected
name qcom_scm in the downstream.

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20251217-multi_waitq_scm-v11-1-f21e50e792b8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

> 
> Alex

-- 
-Mukesh Ojha