Re: [PATCH] fat: avoid parent link count underflow in rmdir
From: OGAWA Hirofumi
Date: Tue Jan 13 2026 - 05:08:10 EST
Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 10:39:59AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Tue, 13 Jan 2026 03:16:54 +0900 OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> > Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> >
>> > > On Tue, 13 Jan 2026 01:45:18 +0800 Zhiyu Zhang <zhiyuzhang999@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Hi OGAWA,
>> > >>
>> > >> Sorry, I thought the further merge request would be done by the maintainers.
>> > >>
>> > >> What should I do then?
>> > >
>> > > That's OK - I have now taken a copy of the patch mainly to keep track
>> > > of it. It won't get lost.
>> > >
>> > > I thought Christian was handling fat patches now, but perhaps that's a
>> > > miscommunication?
>> >
>> > Hm, I was thinking Andrew is still handling the fat specific patch, and
>> > Christian is only handling patches when vfs related.
>> >
>> > Let me know if I need to do something.
>>
>> OK, thanks, seems I misremembered.
>
> I prefer to take anything that touches fs/ - apart from reasonable
> exceptions - to go through vfs tree. So I would prefer to take this
> patch.
OK. I will add you to To: (with Acked-by) instead of Andrew next time?
Thanks.
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>