Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: mailbox: qcom: Add IPCC support for Kaanapali and Glymur Platforms

[Jassi Brar]

On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 11:13 AM Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 10:25 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On 16/01/2026 17:20, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 12:41:44AM -0700, Jingyi Wang wrote:
> > >> Document the Inter-Processor Communication Controller on the Qualcomm
> > >> Kaanapali and Glymur Platforms, which will be used to route interrupts
> > >> across various subsystems found on the SoC.
> > >>
> > >> Co-developed-by: Sibi Sankar <sibi.sankar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibi.sankar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Jingyi Wang <jingyi.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >> ---
> > >>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom-ipcc.yaml | 2 ++
> > >>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > I guess no one is going to apply this, so I did.
> > >
> > > If your patches don't get applied, please chase the maintainers (Jassi)
> > > to apply them.
> >
> >
> > This or it is an effect of known problem with mailbox and interconnect
> > subsystems - maintainers never send notifications of applied patches
> > (neither publicly nor privately like Greg does), so you will never know
> > if anything gets applied.
> >
> > This as well could be in the next silently (wasn't in 15th Jan, though).
>
> Further investigation finds Jassi did apply this and 3 other patches.
> Stephen reported a conflict on 1/6 with another Qcom patch
> (conflicting with Bjorn's tree). No reply to Stephen, but *all* the
> mbox binding patches were dropped.
>
> Here's what was dropped:
>
> f8f632c18c32 dt-bindings: mbox: add pic64gx mailbox compatibility to
> mpfs mailbox
> 945dc11a38a0 dt-bindings: mailbox: qcom: Add CPUCP mailbox controller
> bindings for Kaanapali
> 66b6e5daa915 dt-bindings: mailbox: qcom: Add IPCC support for
> Kaanapali and Glymur Platforms
> 9a92e22740e6 dt-bindings: mailbox: mediatek,mt8196-vcp-mbox: add mtk
> vcp-mbox document
>
Yes, I had to reconstruct the mailbox for-next branch because some
patch had an issue and the pr was not merged after a very late fix.
Sorry I didn't realize people not receiving pick-confirmations was so
problematic. I will make sure I reply to every patch that I pick.
Thanks.