Re: [PATCH v2 16/21] x86/virt/seamldr: Handle TDX Module update failures

[Chao Gao]

On Sun, Jan 18, 2026 at 08:55:22PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>On January 14, 2026 10:24:22 PM PST, Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 07:53:00PM -0700, Chao Gao wrote:
>>> Failures encountered after a successful module shutdown are unrecoverable,
>>> e.g., there is no way to restore the old TDX Module.
>>
>>"e.g." is obscure. To me, the following sentence is explaining the
>>reason why the failure is not recoverable. Maybe "i.e." or "because"?
>
>"e.g." (for example) means the following list is non-exhaustive.

Yes, 'i.e.' or 'because' would be more appropriate since the next sentence
explains 'unrecoverable'.