Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 11/13] selftests/bpf: Migrate struct_ops_assoc test to KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS
From: Eduard Zingerman
Date: Mon Jan 19 2026 - 20:59:15 EST
On Fri, 2026-01-16 at 12:16 -0800, Ihor Solodrai wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h
> index 2357a0340ffe..225ea30c4e3d 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h
> @@ -161,7 +161,9 @@ void bpf_kfunc_rcu_task_test(struct task_struct *ptr) __ksym;
> struct task_struct *bpf_kfunc_ret_rcu_test(void) __ksym;
> int *bpf_kfunc_ret_rcu_test_nostruct(int rdonly_buf_size) __ksym;
>
> -int bpf_kfunc_multi_st_ops_test_1(struct st_ops_args *args, u32 id) __ksym;
> -int bpf_kfunc_multi_st_ops_test_1_impl(struct st_ops_args *args, void *aux__prog) __ksym;
> +#ifndef __KERNEL__
> +extern int bpf_kfunc_multi_st_ops_test_1(struct st_ops_args *args, u32 id) __weak __ksym;
> +extern int bpf_kfunc_multi_st_ops_test_1_assoc(struct st_ops_args *args) __weak __ksym;
> +#endif
Nit: wbpf_kfunc_multi_st_ops_test_1 change is not necessary, right?