Re: [PATCH RESEND net-next v6 0/3] Add DWMAC glue driver for Motorcomm YT6801

From: Georg Gottleuber

Date: Tue Jan 20 2026 - 04:42:34 EST




Am 20.01.26 um 03:45 schrieb Yao Zi:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 06:57:48PM +0100, Georg Gottleuber wrote:
>> Am 19.01.26 um 18:45 schrieb Georg Gottleuber:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> thanks for the quick reply.
>>>
>>> Am 19.01.26 um 16:43 schrieb Russell King (Oracle):
>>>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 04:33:17PM +0100, Georg Gottleuber wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I tested this driver with our TUXEDO InfinityBook Pro AMD Gen9. Iperf
>>>>> revealed that tx is only 100Mbit/s:
>>>>>
>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> With our normally used DKMS module, Ethernet works with full-duplex and
>>>>> gigabit. Attached are some logs from lspci and dmesg. Do you have any
>>>>> idea how I can debug this further?
>>>>
>>>> My suggestion would be:
>>>>
>>>> - Look at the statistics, e.g.
>>>>
>>>> ip -s li sh dev enp2s0
>>>
>>> That looks good (after iperf):
>>>
>>> 2: enp2s0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP
>>> mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
>>> link/ether ba:90:88:24:49:4f brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>>> RX: bytes packets errors dropped missed mcast
>>> 2091654 31556 0 0 0 0
>>> TX: bytes packets errors dropped carrier collsns
>>> 88532451 1518 0 0 0 0
>>>
>>>
>>>> - apply
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/E1vgtBc-00000005D6v-040n@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> to enable more statistics to work, and check the network driver
>>>> statistics:
>>>>
>>>> ethtool --statistics enp2s0
>>>>
>>>> to see if there's any clues for what is going on.
>>>
>>> That looks also good, I think. I saved it before and after the test with
>>> iperf. See attachments.
>>
>> Oh, there was something else interesting in dmesg. See attachment.
>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Georg
>
>> [ 0.933480] dwmac-motorcomm 0000:02:00.0: error -ENOENT: failed to read maca0lr from eFuse
>> [ 0.933483] dwmac-motorcomm 0000:02:00.0: eFuse contains no valid MAC address
>> [ 0.933485] dwmac-motorcomm 0000:02:00.0: fallback to random MAC address
>
> Some vendors didn't write a MAC address to the eFuse. With these YT6801
> chips, the failure is expected.

I believe we have a fixed address, as our DKMS driver always uses it (it
is also displayed in the BIOS).

> Which DKMS driver do you use? Could you read out a permanent address
> with your DKMS driver? If not, this piece of log should have nothing to
> do with the rate problem.

DKMS module we use:
https://gitlab.com/tuxedocomputers/development/packages/tuxedo-yt6801

Apparently, your driver can also read the permanent address. I rebooted
nine times to test it, and it worked nine times. So it was probably a
glitch that doesn't occur very often.

Do you have any ideas on how I can further debug the rate problem?

> Note some out-of-tree driver derived from the vendor one fallback to a
> static MAC address[1], so it doesn't mean your eFuse has MAC address
> written if you only observe the MAC address doesn't change between
> reboots.
>
> Best regards,
> Yao Zi
>
> [1]: https://github.com/ziyao233/yt6801-vendor-driver/blob/0efb3e86702ad2b19e7f9d19172a8e1df143e8c7/fuxi-gmac-common.c#L17-L32