Re: [PATCH v2] staging: rtl8723bs: fix unchecked return value of skb_copy_bits

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 04:59:29PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 10:22:41PM +0900, Minu Jin wrote:

...

> > +	signed int ret;
> 
> Don't put a blank line in the middle of the declaration block.  Just do
> "int ret;".  Everyone knows "int" is signed.  Don't follow the local
> style when the local style is wrong.  Also only use s32 when it's part
> of a networking or hardware spec.  Just use int.  Do people imagine that
> we'll change int to be unsigned?

Not in a far past we changed char to be unsigned :-)

*Yes I know that it's a bit different case.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko