Re: [PATCH RFC v2 03/20] mm/slab: make caches with sheaves mergeable

[Harry Yoo]

On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 12:01:23PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 1/16/26 09:46, Harry Yoo wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 08:24:02AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> >> On 1/16/26 01:22, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 3:17 PM Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >> @@ -337,6 +331,13 @@ struct kmem_cache *__kmem_cache_create_args(const char *name,
> >> >>         flags &= ~SLAB_DEBUG_FLAGS;
> >> >>  #endif
> >> >>
> >> >> +       /*
> >> >> +        * Caches with specific capacity are special enough. It's simpler to
> >> >> +        * make them unmergeable.
> >> >> +        */
> >> >> +       if (args->sheaf_capacity)
> >> >> +               flags |= SLAB_NO_MERGE;
> >> > 
> >> > So, this is very subtle and maybe not that important but the comment
> >> > for kmem_cache_args.sheaf_capacity claims "When slub_debug is enabled
> >> > for the cache, the sheaf_capacity argument is ignored.". With this
> >> > change this argument is not completely ignored anymore... It sets
> >> > SLAB_NO_MERGE even if slub_debug is enabled, doesn't it?
> >> 
> >> True, but the various debug flags set by slub_debug also prevent merging so
> >> it doesn't change the outcome.
> > 
> > nit: except for slub_debug=F (SLAB_CONSISTENCY_CHECKS), since it doesn't
> > prevent merging (it's in SLAB_DEBUG_FLAGS but not in SLAB_NEVER_MERGE).
> 
> Hm right. But I think that's wrong then and it should be there.
> SLAB_CONSISTENCY_CHECKS is enough to stop using the fastpaths (both
> before/after sheaves) so it should be a reason not to merge.

Agreed!

-- 
Cheers,
Harry / Hyeonggon