Re: [PATCH v2] x86/lib: Optimize num_digits() and fix INT_MIN overflow

[David Desobry]

On 1/21/26 10:54, David Laight wrote:

> > I'm not familiar enough with the rest of the codebase to know if
> > changing the function signature to unsigned int is correct here.
>
> In theory you'd need to change the name and all the callers.
>
> 	David

Agreed. It turns out there were very few callers.

I have just submitted V5, which renames the function to 
num_digits_u32(), switches the interface to unsigned int, and updates 
all callers accordingly.

David