Re: [PATCH v3 3/8] sched/topology: Switch to assigning "sd->shared" from s_data
From: Chen, Yu C
Date: Wed Jan 21 2026 - 11:50:34 EST
On 1/20/2026 7:32 PM, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
Use the "sched_domain_shared" object allocated in s_data for
"sd->shared" assignments. Assign "sd->shared" for the topmost
SD_SHARE_LLC domain before degeneration and rely on the degeneration
path to correctly pass down the shared object to "sd_llc".
sd_degenerate_parent() ensures degenerating domains must have the same
sched_domain_span() which ensures 1:1 passing down of the shared object.
If the topmost SD_SHARE_LLC domain degenerates, the shared object is
freed from destroy_sched_domain() when the last reference is dropped.
build_sched_domains() NULLs out the objects that have been assigned as
"sd->shared" and the unassigned ones are freed from the __sds_free()
path.
Post cpu_attach_domain(), all reclaims of "sd->shared" are handled via
call_rcu() on the sched_domain object via destroy_sched_domains_rcu().
Signed-off-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@xxxxxxx>
---
Changelog rfc v2..v3:
o Broke off from a single large patch. Previously
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20251208092744.32737-3-kprateek.nayak@xxxxxxx/
---
kernel/sched/topology.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
index 623e8835d322..0f56462fef6f 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
@@ -679,6 +679,9 @@ static void update_top_cache_domain(int cpu)
if (sd) {
id = cpumask_first(sched_domain_span(sd));
size = cpumask_weight(sched_domain_span(sd));
+
+ /* If sd_llc exists, sd_llc_shared should exist too. */
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!sd->shared);
sds = sd->shared;
}
@@ -727,6 +730,13 @@ cpu_attach_domain(struct sched_domain *sd, struct root_domain *rd, int cpu)
if (sd_parent_degenerate(tmp, parent)) {
tmp->parent = parent->parent;
+ /* Pick reference to parent->shared. */
+ if (parent->shared) {
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(tmp->shared);
+ tmp->shared = parent->shared;
+ parent->shared = NULL;
+ }
+
if (parent->parent) {
parent->parent->child = tmp;
parent->parent->groups->flags = tmp->flags;
@@ -1732,16 +1742,6 @@ sd_init(struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl,
sd->cache_nice_tries = 1;
}
- /*
- * For all levels sharing cache; connect a sched_domain_shared
- * instance.
- */
- if (sd->flags & SD_SHARE_LLC) {
- sd->shared = *per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sds, sd_id);
- atomic_inc(&sd->shared->ref);
- atomic_set(&sd->shared->nr_busy_cpus, sd_weight);
- }
-
sd->private = sdd;
return sd;
@@ -2655,8 +2655,19 @@ build_sched_domains(const struct cpumask *cpu_map, struct sched_domain_attr *att
unsigned int imb_span = 1;
for (sd = *per_cpu_ptr(d.sd, i); sd; sd = sd->parent) {
+ struct sched_domain *parent = sd->parent;
struct sched_domain *child = sd->child;
+ /* Attach sd->shared to the topmost SD_SHARE_LLC domain. */
+ if ((sd->flags & SD_SHARE_LLC) &&
+ (!parent || !(parent->flags & SD_SHARE_LLC))) {
+ int llc_id = cpumask_first(sched_domain_span(sd));
+
+ sd->shared = *per_cpu_ptr(d.sds, llc_id);
I agree that in the current implementation, we use the llc_id="first CPU" to
index into d.sds, and this value actually represents the LLC ID. In the
cache-aware scheduling, we plan to convert the llc_id to a logical ID that
is no longer tied to the CPU number. Just 2 cents, to avoid confusion, maybe
rename the aforementioned llc_id to sd_id?
Anyway I will run some tests on the entire patch set and provide feedback
afterward.
thanks,
Chenyu