Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] ACPI: PCI: simplify code with acpi_get_local_u64_address()

From: Bjorn Helgaas

Date: Wed Jan 21 2026 - 18:24:28 EST


On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 09:50:49AM +0100, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Now we have a helper so there's no need to open-code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>

Looks like most drivers/acpi commits capitalize the subject line,
e.g., s/simplify/Simplify/

> ---
>
> v2: fixed a typo (LKP)
>
> drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c
> index 741bcc9d6d6a..15234b65ea22 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c
> @@ -42,8 +42,9 @@ static int
> check_slot(acpi_handle handle, unsigned long long *sun)
> {
> int device = -1;
> - unsigned long long adr, sta;
> + unsigned long long sta;
> acpi_status status;
> + u64 adr;
> struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
>
> acpi_get_name(handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &buffer);
> @@ -56,10 +57,9 @@ check_slot(acpi_handle handle, unsigned long long *sun)
> goto out;
> }
>
> - status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_ADR", NULL, &adr);
> - if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> - pr_debug("_ADR returned %d on %s\n",
> - status, (char *)buffer.pointer);
> + if (acpi_get_local_u64_address(handle, &adr)) {
> + pr_debug("_ADR returned with failure on %s\n",
> + (char *)buffer.pointer);
> goto out;
> }
>
> --
> 2.50.1
>