Re: [PATCH net v3 6/7] net/sched: act_gate: reject empty schedule list
From: Paul Moses
Date: Mon Jan 26 2026 - 03:53:42 EST
Should REPLACE with an explicit entry list that yields 0 entries return -EINVAL or should it be treated the same as omitting TCA_GATE_ENTRY_LIST and keeping the old schedule?
thanks,
Paul
On Wednesday, January 21st, 2026 at 3:49 PM, Victor Nogueira <victor@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On 21/01/2026 16:44, Victor Nogueira wrote:
>
> > On 21/01/2026 10:20, Paul Moses wrote:
> >
> > > Reject empty schedules (num_entries == 0) so next_entry is always
> > > valid and
> > > RCU readers/timer logic never walk an empty list. taprio enforces the
> > > same
> > > constraint on schedules (sch_taprio.c, commit 09dbdf28f9f9fa).
> > >
> > > Fixes: a51c328df310 ("net: qos: introduce a gate control flow action")
> > > Signed-off-by: Paul Moses p@xxxxxxx
> > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > ---
> > > net/sched/act_gate.c | 6 ++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/net/sched/act_gate.c b/net/sched/act_gate.c
> > > index 48ff378bb051a..e4134b9a4a314 100644
> > > --- a/net/sched/act_gate.c
> > > +++ b/net/sched/act_gate.c
> > > @@ -509,6 +509,12 @@ static int tcf_gate_init(struct net *net, struct
> > > nlattr *nla,
> > > cycletime_ext = nla_get_u64(tb[TCA_GATE_CYCLE_TIME_EXT]);
> > > p->tcfg_cycletime_ext = cycletime_ext;
> > > + if (p->num_entries == 0) {
> > > + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "The entry list is empty");
> > > + err = -EINVAL;
> > > + goto release_mem;
> > > + }
> >
> > It would be simpler to check this in parse_gate_list.
> > That way you could return -EINVAL there directly
> > in case 0 entries were passed.
>
>
> On second thought, I believe it would be better
> to check whether parse_gate_list's return is 0
> and the op is a create. Something like:
>
> err = parse_gate_list(tb[TCA_GATE_ENTRY_LIST], p, extack);
> ...
> if (!err && ret == ACT_P_CREATED) {
> NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "The entry list is empty");
> err = -EINVAL;
> goto release_mem;
> }
>
> so that you don't need to add new arguments to
> parse_gate_list.
>
> cheers,
> Victor