Re: [PATCH 18/21] iio: Replace IRQF_ONESHOT with IRQF_NO_THREAD

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 11:10:34AM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2026-01-26 11:51:13 [+0200], Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Cc: Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Cc: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Cc: David Lechner <dlechner@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Cc: "Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Cc: Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Cc: Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Cc: Kent Gustavsson <kent@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Cc: Gustavo Silva <gustavograzs@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Cc: Nishant Malpani <nish.malpani25@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Cc: linux-iio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > 
> …
> > I didn't follow. How? What tools do you use?
> 
> b4/ git.

> > > So I have to move them for each submission. Or is there something I am not
> > > aware of?
> > 
> > Make them in the tail of commit messages locally with a delimiter, they will
> > always be present as long as they are in your tree.
> > 
> > I dunno if `b4` manages the Cc lists separately. At least I see no-one using
> > `b4` *and* putting the Cc noise into the commit messages, so I assume it
> > behaves nicely.
> 
> I point is if I move them for one submission,

It will be in your Git tree as a part of the commit message.

What I mean is that your commit message will be like

  $PREFIX: $SUMMARY
  ...blank line...
  $COMMIT_MESSAGE
  ...blank line...
  $TAG
  Signed-off-by: ...
  ---
  Cc: person 1
  Cc: person 2

Just don't reimport them via `git am`.

> I lose it on the next if I update patches in tree and re-export them. 

I don't understand this, sorry. Can you provide a step-by-step example?
Do you mean that you are taking previous version from the list and reapplying
it via `git am`? But shouldn't `b4` take care of that as long as it knows the
Change-ID and it matches?

...

Hmm... The https://b4.docs.kernel.org/en/latest/contributor/prep.html
doesn't clearly tell me if there is a carry-on procedure for the Cc
list between versions.

...

> > > > > +		ret = devm_request_irq(dev, st->irq,
> > > > > +				       iio_trigger_generic_data_rdy_poll,
> > > > > +				       IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_NO_THREAD,
> > > > > +				       indio_dev->name, st->dready_trig);
> > > > >  		if (ret < 0)
> > > > >  			return ret;
> > > > 
> > > > Interestingly that this driver ignores the flags from firmware... Seems to me
> > > > like a bug (not in your patch, obviously). Ditto for other drivers doing similar
> > > > things.
> > > 
> > > If the irq-chip is level or unknown mode on boot up/ default and the
> > > device can only operate as an edge-rising then I don't see why this
> > > should be a bug.
> > 
> > But if FW says use "level", wouldn't this setting override it?
> 
> Yes, it will. It was common to use it pre-device-tree time where this
> information was not configured automatically before ->probe. Now it
> might be missing/wrong in the dt for some of the old devices.
> It might be a left-over which continued to grow and spread.

It may be considered as a bug, especially in the cases when the driver works
only on DT/ACPI platforms.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko