Re: [iwl-net PATCH v2] idpf: change IRQ naming to match netdev and ethtool queue numbering
From: Brian Vazquez
Date: Mon Jan 26 2026 - 12:40:35 EST
On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 11:24 AM Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 02:46:24PM +0000, Brian Vazquez wrote:
> > The code uses the vidx for the IRQ name but that doesn't match ethtool
> > reporting or netdev naming, this makes it hard to tune the device and
> > associate queues with IRQs. Sequentially requesting irqs starting from
> > '0' makes the output consistent.
> >
> > Before:
> >
> > ethtool -L eth1 tx 1 combined 3
> >
> > grep . /proc/irq/*/*idpf*/../smp_affinity_list
> > /proc/irq/67/idpf-Mailbox-0/../smp_affinity_list:0-55,112-167
> > /proc/irq/68/idpf-eth1-TxRx-1/../smp_affinity_list:0
> > /proc/irq/70/idpf-eth1-TxRx-3/../smp_affinity_list:1
> > /proc/irq/71/idpf-eth1-TxRx-4/../smp_affinity_list:2
> > /proc/irq/72/idpf-eth1-Tx-5/../smp_affinity_list:3
> >
> > ethtool -S eth1 | grep -v ': 0'
> > NIC statistics:
> > tx_q-0_pkts: 1002
> > tx_q-1_pkts: 2679
> > tx_q-2_pkts: 1113
> > tx_q-3_pkts: 1192 <----- tx_q-3 vs idpf-eth1-Tx-5
> > rx_q-0_pkts: 1143
> > rx_q-1_pkts: 3172
> > rx_q-2_pkts: 1074
> >
> > After:
> >
> > ethtool -L eth1 tx 1 combined 3
> >
> > grep . /proc/irq/*/*idpf*/../smp_affinity_list
> >
> > /proc/irq/67/idpf-Mailbox-0/../smp_affinity_list:0-55,112-167
> > /proc/irq/68/idpf-eth1-TxRx-0/../smp_affinity_list:0
> > /proc/irq/70/idpf-eth1-TxRx-1/../smp_affinity_list:1
> > /proc/irq/71/idpf-eth1-TxRx-2/../smp_affinity_list:2
> > /proc/irq/72/idpf-eth1-Tx-3/../smp_affinity_list:3
> >
> > ethtool -S eth1 | grep -v ': 0'
> > NIC statistics:
> > tx_q-0_pkts: 118
> > tx_q-1_pkts: 134
> > tx_q-2_pkts: 228
> > tx_q-3_pkts: 138 <--- tx_q-3 matches idpf-eth1-Tx-3
> > rx_q-0_pkts: 111
> > rx_q-1_pkts: 366
> > rx_q-2_pkts: 120
>
> Are there any ABI issues here?
The patch doesn't change the format, it just fixes the numbering in
the name to make it consistent with other reporting tools. It
shouldn't break any library.
> Andrew