Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: sram: qcom,imem: Document glymur as compatible

[Ananthu C V]

On Sat, Jan 24, 2026 at 09:57:18PM +0530, Kathiravan Thirumoorthy wrote:
> 
> On 1/23/2026 3:46 PM, Ananthu C V wrote:
> > Add compatible for Qualcomm's glymur IMEM.
> 
> Shouldn't we use "mmio-sram" binding? Please note, starting from
> "kaanapali", IMEM is described as "mmio-sram". If we need to stick with this
> binding, please describe the same on why so?
> 

Great, thanks for this review. Initially Krzysztof also pointed out in v1 that
the placement is wrong (thanks Krzysztof). But I couldn't find internal docs
regarding this and since I missed out on sorting it, I thought that was the
wrong placement. I see that the kaanapali imem binding thread has sufficient
info on this, so I'll test with mmio-sram and make a revision if that works.