Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 07/17] mm: introduce BPF OOM struct ops

[Michal Hocko]

Once additional point I forgot to mention previously

On Mon 26-01-26 18:44:10, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> @@ -1168,6 +1180,13 @@ bool out_of_memory(struct oom_control *oc)
>  		return true;
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Let bpf handle the OOM first. If it was able to free up some memory,
> +	 * bail out. Otherwise fall back to the kernel OOM killer.
> +	 */
> +	if (bpf_handle_oom(oc))
> +		return true;
> +
>  	select_bad_process(oc);
>  	/* Found nothing?!?! */
>  	if (!oc->chosen) {

Should this check for is_sysrq_oom and always use the in kernel OOM
handling for Sysrq triggered ooms as a failsafe measure?
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs