Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] mm/vmscan: don't demote if there is not enough free memory in the lower memory tier

[Gregory Price]

On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 10:56:44AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >                 .gfp_mask = (GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE & ~__GFP_RECLAIM) |
> >                         __GFP_NOMEMALLOC | GFP_NOWAIT,
> >         };
> 
> This will trigger kswapd so there will be background reclaim demoting
> from those lower tiers.
> 

given the node is full kswapd will be running, but the above line masks
~__GFP_RECLAIM so it's not supposed to trigger either reclaim path.

> > Any chance you are using hugetlb on this system?  This looks like a
> > clear bug, but it may not be what you're experiencing.
> 
> Hugetlb pages are not sitting on LRU lists so they are not participating
> in the demotion.
> 

I noted in the v4 thread (responded there too) this was the case.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/aXksUiwYGwad5JvC@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F/

But since then we found another path through this code that adds
reclaim back on as well - and i wouldn't be surprised to find more.

the bigger issue is that this fix can cause inversions in transient
pressure situations - and in fact the current code will cause inversions
instead of waiting for reclaim to clear out lower nodes.

The reality is this code probably needs a proper look and detangling.

This has been on my back-burner for a while - i've wanted to sink the 
actual demotion code into memory-tiers.c and provide something like:

... mt_demote_folios(src_nid, folio_list)
{
	/* apply some demotion policy here */
}

~Gregory