Re: [PATCH v6 1/7] dt-bindings: i2c: xiic: make clocks optional

[Conor Dooley]

On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 03:34:02PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 12:21:41PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 1/28/26 11:37, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 09:03:55PM +0000, Abdurrahman Hussain wrote:
> > > > The xiic driver is designed to operate without explicit clock configuration
> > > 
> > > And if you change this in the driver, then you change bindings?
> > > 
> > > You miss here explanation based on hardware - how does the hardware work
> > > if nothing ticks it clocks?
> > 
> > Hardware obviously have clock input which needs to be connected. Without it
> > it won't work.
> 
> Should ACPI potential limitations be making the DT description less
> accurate?

We absolutely should not be cocking up bindings because ACPI requires
less complete descriptions.

> Would it not be better that the driver has an DT binding and an ACPI
> binding? Where there are common properties, common functions can be
> used to retrieve them. However, if ACPI lacks usable clocks, use the
> of_ method to get the clock from DT, and skip it for ACPI.
> 
>     Andrew
> 
>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature